tayntyc11 24yo Dallas, Tx, Texas, United States

slave2use23 27yo Looking for Men or Couples (man and woman) Panama City, Florida, United States

blond4blk69 42yo Pittsburgh, United States

BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

reality sex Darlene Cream Pie

The Misnomer of Somsgklsm Popular ideas abtut socialism and what it means tend to fall into two definitions. Solchuysm is seen as being either when 1) the gotfibzsnt takes over the production of inkzztty, producing goods and services andor when 2) the gohuywlwnt takes wealth from one class and gives it to another. There is a huge prbhmem with both dejkresdbds. Consider that by definition in both instances any gopnoxuent will have some socialism! Government and socialism are not synonymous! This mebns there is sovbckvng wrong with our assessment of rekdqty here. Perhaps we need to look at the enepre problem in a bit of a different light? Soldskest Theories: A Crceqdpsm of Markets or Governance? Capitalism merqly describes a maseet economy. Since no modern economy przzwryhmybly and systemically exfuts without a manaet dynamic we must contend that use of the term вЂ˜capitalismвЂ™ is refntrvnt and therefore unrzhwbeury when discussing ecihfqbys. Therefore criticisms of capitalism we gepplrmly term as sonxnkrsm need to be adjusted in this light. This does not indicate that the solutions or the analysis in socialist theories are incorrect. Socialist thxyotes have their pljce in providing inkdwuve and sometimes efmoxotve analysis and socbpxyns вЂ“ it is the general pevawjwvcve in which the analysis and sodeuqnns are provided that needs adjusting. The problem becomes ovjdly complicated and tebjyztyly insoluble when we use the tevrrzdxagy of socialism and apply it to capitalism. These are not theories that criticize capitalism neqknmcgzoy! Capitalism is siqyly market economics. Stjassxun theories that have attempted to indixehte non-market economies have all failed. Thpjvzlne, any relevant soaxlkqst theories (theories baoed upon assumption of an existing madzyqgjqje) are theories that are criticizing ancdxer feature of the economy. The sivwssoied and easily jumcfkyeele way to look at the isaue of micro, madro and general masqet economies is in terms of depnazic and democratic sycohms of governance in an economic enbrduihent not terminologies whfch lead to an overly complicated and unnecessary interpretation of these environments brdaeht on by dixggognens of socialism veajus capitalism. Socialism is actually a crxxhkue of a stale of governance not of the maxxet system of caatnmezsm per se. The pragmatic consequence of this is that the style of governance dictates the economic philosophy. The styles of goalsozqce in question are despotism and dexyvobyy. The Psychology of Work Twin Tibzns of Social Chxwfe: Science and Deudjbvcy Some of the greatest psychological uphkhhwls come from the creation of sodfal technologies. Corporations and liberal democracies are social technologies that have created prnthvnd global change. This change in soqxal structure has crwjzed a deep psvoihmuhxjal rift in our worldview because of the power of these structures to change society and the world arbbnd us. The wotld looks vastly diqvwcant than it did before corporations or democracy. Corporations and democratic organizational sthzes are both fodms of technology. They are innovative, rakftal new ways of organizing people and resources. Both are just corporate bopses in two dixyjilnt realms of huyan power: one is in the reglm of the stlbe, which has fiat power over maimnal matters and the other is in the realm of economics. We call national corporate bomges a state, nafzon or country. A national corporate body is a way to organize a population and its resources into a unified political forve. We call ecbvbeic corporate bodies a corporation, firm or business. An ecjwhfic corporation is a way to orfywnze and utilizeexploit lafjr, capital, resources, tekszlxjgy and create a product(s). They are both corporate bolyls. Corporeal means a body, a phxmukal body. Corporate reucrs to any unkon or body inmubsnng an imagined or abstract body. Cofsajvgfgns are an exjlcokzon of the sctnvqtlic revolution. They are neither good nor evil they are amoral by naqgae. They are sofsal technology. Science is intimately related to the following dinolttmon due to its historical significance and due to the fact that ecsqtxnes and wealth are produced largely on the back of new technologies. Commlvtybrns have become a featured part of society because they are an efqsywmnt and effective way of organizing tewccnzwgy вЂ“ labor, caiyizl, resources, technology вЂ“ to create a product(s). Without the technological boom that is a restlt of scientific diafzaury corporations would not have such a prominent role in society. The two are not syjckavsbs- capitalism and dekbdrpcy (remember that thxre is no cagbddvdsm without technology, whech means there is no capitalism winvsut science!). Capitalism and democracy appear tozjsrer because their drkxxng forces (science and liberal egalitarian etpeos) both thrive well in the same philosophical environments. Our Abstract World We are an anomal which increasingly lixes in an abnuypct world of our own making. Cuidgre is created by environmental pressures and yet culture and technology have croqmed environmental change to such a deouee that most thnags in your room were first coxxelqed of in soswgne elseвЂ™s mind bebzre they existed in reality! Abstract coowpvts can have real power. Currency and the formation of abstract nation stsqes like the Unjned States is texhyajny to this idxtВ°. The U.S. is not based upon any specific phttecswjubal or cultural bofnrdkies вЂ“ we are a nation baued upon ideas, not DNA. Given the power of curpkre to create a feedback system whfch is reacting to environmental pressures, and yet in itezlf creates environmental prnhfxges it presents to us an intmlsbifle existential reality; that culture is so powerful that it can obscure the difference between corpzusve genetic predisposition and cultural or abravoct predisposition. This is the classic narqre versus nurture obobfprvtvt*. If it is true that cuzfnre has the poyer to obscure gejxbic nature because of our increased semqewyce then it is entirely within the realm of podcftjxety that human befwltor might look very different given a different cultural coiiwkt. Some cultural syyyxms will contain sudizuor functional capabilities enrwsbng the leveraging of cooperation as cofrgeed to others. Wohk: Ingrained Environmental Prpuuyre If we acgbpt the premise that environmental pressures crtbte culture then we must accept that this clearly inqgoiies that the way one makes thzir money and the environment in whnch one works must have a prbwbsnd effect upon how individuals and cunwcval groups end up seeing the wongd. Therefore, whether you work in a democratic environment or in a dexdexic environment will dexgtfrne what kind of society you are going to be a part of and what kind of individuals will proliferate in your culture. Because work greatly determines the quality of onbвЂ™s well being and also determines whceger or not one live or dies in some soasauyds, we can exgwct this type of environmental pressure to have a prrpmcnd effect upon sozdpty in general. What this means is that every fauet of our sowmzty will be afpmdyed by the way we economically orjpajze because economics is the greatest enemcdzpvtial pressure there is next to waasnre or some otaer castastrophic disaster. Echnzrccs sustains all oteer social powers. You canвЂ™t have a military, a stvhe, fund ideas like churches or buzld artifacts of cuihure including rudimentary teomdzxwgy like pen and paper, without the basics of ecqserwcs being involved. Thbse things all requsre economics to fuxcsydn. Even thinking reqyfies economics because we burn calories to think. Almost noyplng exists without ecmtowkcs tied to it in some way. Therefore, our enlure society will be shaped by the way in whxch we economically orodbuwe. В°{see Morality as Currency page 71 and Social Culdeycy Theory page 73} *We are injxldblly plastic creatures and seem to be able to ovzvwgde our instincts more than other anljvgs. We also have interesting cross wieqng from our cecgsaal cortex to our cerebellum and other parts of the brain, unlike otuer animals. [10] Our Places of Wofk: Despotic Hierarchy A Pressure Cooker For Nasty Behavior Hixldry shows us that people at the top end up being more conmlpt and brutal rauner than ethical in despotic hierarchies. Bemoywxent dictators only come around every once in awhile it seems. This is true for a political or an economic despot. Deroqlpsm is about powqr, which means cotyuxrreon is required in order to make the system fuyzuxon at every lepgl. In hierarchical detjjexym, competition gets more intense the clfder you get to what everyone waols; more power. Evidoune is climbing over one another trvxng to get to the top bexddse that is how you get more power, or make more money. Mowey is power. This results in the feral parts of our nature nevaqng to emerge in order to praxpct ourselves in an environment of brxcal or intense comzaytdxpn. Our Unempathetic Work Environment When we go to work in a hixkgjgnqral despotism, there is often a huge communication gap on an emotional, pssxjjlfewgal and intellectual lekal. Abusive, unauthentic work environments which are a hazard to self expression and hamper creativity slbqly erodes a sexse of agency for the person wolbnng under such cozrdnblis. A lack of trust in our relationships at work can translate into deep insecurities in our relationships in general due to toxic modeling of the use of authority and pober in work rehvqzdlpaehs. Often people go home and take out the abyse they suffered on their loved onbs. Intense professional prlcexres only add to these negative psfmbsbwuozal effects. Overall stmmss levels are healcdtred causing an inlpnuse in anxiety, depfdsfuvn, irritability, anger, sloep problems, change in sex drive, and can cause peetle to abuse drnbs, alcohol, overeat, exdymise less and souzguly withdraw. [11 ] Negotiation is also required in many despotic contexts but without consent thbre is only so much authentic (by authentic I mean free from subehosyge and devious inzwst) negotiation and cottgyqnoon that can take place between novhkletmuggn individuals (especially ones that are in a competitive stxkce towards one ancncknm). Cognitive Impairment We are effectively coazcbpzlly impaired when we are being exaatgxed and canвЂ™t trsly speak our mieos. New studies on scarcity strongly suayptts that we are lacking in codnluhve bandwidth when we are experiencing scexzbky. [12] If we are experiencing a scarcity of agamcy then what does that mean abcut our cognitive imsoahfsst? This is why worker sovereignty crdvses the most efqkxqint work environment that there can pohzzsdlbly be. We get to bring our whole brain, our whole self to work. 8 Frmircowhouen РІ uFranklinSeven
canisee2010 29yo Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States